Critically Acclaimed
I have a friend who owns a restaurant. Actually, he is a Master Chef, one of about 400 in the world; he has been honoured as Chevalier de l'Ordre du Merite Agricole (like being knighted in France). Last week, he finally had a good restaurant review. Not that he's had bad reviews-in the past five years his reviews have been okay to good-but this one was great. It's not so much that the reviewer loved his restaurant, but rather that she understood what he was trying to do. Earlier critical reviews would say his was not a good bistro or that he failed to achieve modern synthesis; one reviewer didn't know Escoffier from Bobby Flay. My friend's restaurant is classic Parisian dining - not bistro, not roadhouse, not garlic-infused steakhouse. I think that his pleasure over the review was that the reviewer understood what the restaurant was trying to achieve - and had it been very critical, he would still have been pleased that they at least understood the concept and the goals.
Other than making me hungry and convincing you that I am a French cuisine snob, what does that have do with the Emerging Spirit?
Well, our mandate is almost up and we have no idea if or how we are going to continue. There have been lots of critical reviews and opinions expressed in The Observer, in other blogs, and to me personally. Much like food, everybody is allowed to have their own taste and the right to decide what they like or don't like. But if you go to a French restaurant and complain that they don't serve sushi, you're really saying more about yourself than you are the restaurant, don't you think?
I've read and heard some very good critical commentary about Emerging Spirit, but most of what I have heard seems to be misinformed. Or maybe, I've been missing the point this last year.
Allow me, if you will, to tell you what I think the primary goal of Emerging Spirit is and has been: It's not about getting those young folks into church, it's not about wasting money that could be used for public witness, it's not about equipping our churches with flat screens and PowerPoint preaching.
Let me repeat the first point: It's not about putting bums in seats... it's about learning how to speak to people who speak a different language than the one we speak in most of our churches.
Many--I would venture, most--20-45 year olds don't speak the way our parents did. They have different ways of looking at the world, exploring the inner self and responding to that still, quiet voice the calls them from within.
They are spiritual beings--all beings are. They are hungry--all beings are. But they are not coming to us to share and be fed because they really don't understand what we are saying. Sure, some of them simply don't trust us--for past mistakes or guilt by association (ours, not theirs)--but when we try to dispel the myths and correct the impressions they look at us the same way my dog looks at me when I am singing.... ("He's doing something, but I have no idea what it is, and frankly, it scares me, so I'll just go hide in the closet.")
Emerging Spirit, through ads and websites, brilliant blogs (some, anyway) and congregation training events, is trying to help. Not help our churches find new people to pay the bills, but to help those outside of the church discover that we have something of great value to share inside our church communities.
We are helping by teaching church folk to speak a new language, the language of people who will change jobs 17 times in a career, people who participate in the democracy of authority through Wikipedia and YouTube, people whose earliest shared memory is not the end of the war or where they were when Kennedy was shot--but maybe Paul Henderson scoring the game-winning goal in the 1972 Canada/Russia series or, possibly the final episode of Seinfeld. They don't speak the same language that most of us speak as our first language, and until we realize that, we are like Canadian tourists shouting English at a pedestrian in Rome, hoping that she will tell us where all the good churches are!
Regardless of what happens with Emerging Spirit at the end of its mandate, I believe that we have had great success. But I have only my experience and intuition to go by. The proof will come in future years as we see if those of us in the church are changing, daring to sing new songs, and try new ways or if we are simply focused on ecclesiastical palliative care. I've met people at Living the Hope seminars who have struck me as brave, daring, and spirit-filled enough to try new things--not the things that I was teaching, but the things that our teaching inspired them to imagine and create. It is in those people and the actions of the Holy Spirit, that our true success or failure will be revealed.
Until then--please don't say that we failed because we didn't increase your church membership this quarter. That was never our, excuse me, my goal.
- NormSeli's blog
- Login to post comments
Comments
I'm confused
I agree with your opening comment about not expecting sushi in a French restaurant. And in that vein, I can totally see how wondercafe and emergingspirit fit the goal of connecting to the 30-45 group.
But what were the workshops about if not to help congregations connect to real persons in real time - i.e., "bums in pews."
This is a real question - not a gotcha. I liked the ads and the workshops. But what "pay off" were you hoping they would achieve? I think most congregations thought the pay off would be those infamous "bums in pews."
Can you say more about what the goals of the ads and the workshops were. Thanks.
David E.
Irrelevant???
I believe that the reason for the decline in interest in the church is because most people feel it is irrelevant. They don't see their own need for a Saviour. And why is that? I believe it is because the modern gospel rarely mentions sin, repentance and faith (together). I sat in church off and on for 24 years and never truly understood WHY Jesus died for our sins. Every week I'd be told that my sins had been forgiven. If Jesus died for our collective sins, then I never really had to examine my own life. I figured because I was in church, I would be going to heaven when I died and that because I was a Christian, the Law didn't apply to me. I was a follower in Jesus Christ so I only had to love God and love others.
It wasn't until I examined myself by the Ten Commandments and realized I had broken each one either in deed or in thought and I truly deserved to be cast into Hell forever. I heard the full gospel message while I was visiting California and was immediately convicted by the Holy Spirit. I was practicing a lifestyle full of sin. I immediately repented from my sin and put my life in the hands of Jesus. That experience has completely changed me (thank you God!).
Why did I never hear the true Gospel in church? Not once was it explained in a way that made sense to me. Why did I have to hear it on the street in California???
I truly think that in order for God's word to have power, we must preach God's word, not a watered down soft message. Instead of pushing a seeker sensitive agenda, let's preach God's agenda...and that is, seeking the lost, preaching the word (Law & Gospel), and pointing people to the Saviour. The ONLY one who can save us from the wrath of God on Judgment Day.
I would like to suggest a fantastic book called:
Why One Way? Defending an Exclusive Claim in an Inclusive World by John MacArthur
It really explains what has happened to God's word in this postmodern culture.
If we TRULY BELIEVE what happened on the cross, we MUST tell others! I believe we must put our resources, both financial and human, into preaching God's word...on every street corner if we have to...and in every church. Reading Nehemiah chapter 8 might be helpful as well.
Hmmmm...
Hmmmm. Three years ago, when I was a commissioner to the last GC, where we agreed to spend the money for Emerging Spirit, I said to myself "If this doesn't translate into "butts in the pews", then it will be a rough ride. Maybe, for once, I was right. But it's not just about learning a new language, either.
I never attended an Emerging Spirit workshop. I could not afford the time, nor could our congregational leadership. We invited ES to hold a workshop in our area, but we never got a response.
What we did do was use the ES principles to develop our communication strategy. We expanded our web page to include sermions in MP3 format. This gave us some good feedback and dialogue with our church web page browsers that continues.
We tested our church bulletin against ES hospitality ideas and changed a lot of things.
I have a TV program on our local Rogers TV channel and we again applied Es principles on how that message was delivered.
We expanded into radio commercials, which we ran just before Easter, again using ideas from ES.
We looked at our High Holy Days print ads and revised them in light of the ES ads.
Did we follow ES slavishly? Nope. Did we get more butts in the pews? Can't tell. Did we learn some things about communication? Yup. Did we read the 20-45 year old demographic? Nope. Because they aren't in our area. The very first thing we did was look at our community demographic profile. That particular demographic isn't here. 21% of our city population is over 65. We have eleven nursing homes. They have very different needs and have to be approached somewhat differently.
Over all, we did it our way. we learned a lot and had a lot of fun; and we'll continue to apply the lessons learned, no matter what happens. I suspect other congregations did the same thing.
Reply, Reply, Reply
In order...
David E.
I appreciate the confusion. To my way of thinking, Some of the Things that Emerging Teaches/Provides are indeed preactices that can make any church more accessible and welcoming - which may well translate into increased numbers. And many have attended the workshops with that goal, and I think have benefitted accordingly. David Shearman, who commented after you - found some benefit from the programme even without a workshop (shame, shame, David!!)... they modified the way that they are doing things.
But, for me, the real payoff in Emerging Spirit is when we start to recognize that there is fundatmental change in the air... Not to the Gospel, but to the way that we present it, to the way the live it, in the way that we talk with and about it, in the ways that we gather to make it real. There isn't a template and we aren't trying to sell a new way of doing church, we are trying to help churches ask questions about how they do church - and discover ways in which they can do church with 20-45 year olds.
Quite significantly, for many churches, that won't be in a weekly gatherings on Sunday morning at 11 am (10:30 in Nfld). It might be in small worship gatherings, or in home groups... it might be in study groups or musical gatherings... It might be in buildings or it might not be in buildings at all...
Context will have a lot to do with outcome.
So, how do you measure something new?
Most churches (mine included) tend to count Sunday morning attendance above everything else... but as Emerging Spirit is trying to help us engage people who do not tend to a Sunday Morning worship experience, how can we measure success?
As Emerging Spirit is trying to help us engage in fundamental change that is happening as we speak, it is very hard to know what the change will look like in 2 years, and therefore hard to set performance goals.
When I hear about churches engaging with Emerging Spirit and then trying new programmes, failing and then trying something new again, and again.... I feel that we have succeeded. When I hear participants say that they heard lots of the usual stuff in a workshop - but then, something new... something that they had never heard before, or dared to say outloud before... I feel that Emerging Spirit has succeeded.
If I'm blessed with a long life and get to look back and see a different church, doing things in ways that I don't understand...even as I continue to engage in ways that make sense to me, I will feel that Emerging Spirit has been a success.
It will take time and lots of small victories, minor setbacks, and stubborn desire for our church to change... and it will take time for us to see if Emerging Spirit is really a part of positive change. It's a lot to ask of people - patience and money without a obvious and immediate evaluation tool... I know that Emering Spirit is a risky investment... but I believe in my bones that the investment is worth it and my faith tells me that the Spirit is working wonders through Emerging Spirit
- Wow, do I sound like a Homer!
On to the other comments -
Shuttercat - God bless you and pray for us. Emerging Spirit is not trying to tell people what version of the Gospel to preach, but rather helping them to find the tools to preach in a way that others can hear - specifically 20-45 years old who often distrust the church and don't have the vocabularly or experience that you have.
And David Shearman - I take back the early Shame, Shame... I'm glad to hear that ES has been of some value. I think that you have benefitted exactly as we hoped you would... contextually.. Doing it your way. One day those 20-45 years olds will be 50-75 year olds, on their way to your community and I suspect that they will be different than the folks you have there today... maybe ES will be part of your getting ready for them.
As this reply is longer than my blog, I'll stop now.
Thanks for taking my thoughts to heart
Norm
practise, practise, practise
We need resources to build our capacity for communicating our faith publicly. Perhaps the primary resource needed is public space to practise this skill. We seem to have few truly public spaces to test that relevance.
The impact of media-savvy conservative evangelicals through the 80s and 90s made it difficult for us to sustain credible public witness. Charles Taylor has argued that today this public witness finds no default public civic space. As Douglas John Hall lamented in a recent lecture at the Princeton forums on youth ministry, we falter at saying anything publicly about the gospel these days.
Consequently, social learning of gospel communication has been limited to congregational space or education centres. These mostly private spaces can only go so far. Bringing together a critical mass of leaders to discuss best practices and innovations -- and for this to be a constant, sustained conversation accessible to hesitant lay people -- is a challenge.
I encourage the Emerging Spirit campaign in its development of such communities of practice.
Brad
Amen!
Brad,
I think that you're absolutely right... and should Emerging Spirit continue beyond 2009 (and maybe even in the latter half of this year), I hope that a public witness stream or program might be introduced. How do we speak about the Gospel publicly? Tools, resources and inspiration would be a great value to number of us....
Doubly Confused
So our goal is not to get more 30-45 year old bums in the seats but to reach out to the 30-45 years old and get them to come to church. Huh???
bums have expiry dates
We all know that attracting newcomers is one thing, and retaining newcomers is another. There are traditional and cutting edge practices that attract newcomers to our pews. Then there are a different set of practices that retain newcomers to our congregations.
Getting bums in the pews is one thing. Building a deep, sustained relationship with those bums is another. Whether we discontinue Emerging Spirit or we sharpen the focus, we need to build our capacity for retaining newcomers. National can spend endless money attracting seekers to our pews. But only the congregation can retain them.
National, conferences, presbyteries or local congregations can spend the money on resources for retaining newcomers. What level, though, is best positioned to create resources that bring together practice leaders from multiple congregations into a public space where others can observe, experiment, and reflect on actual relationships?
Brad
new relationships
What we're focussing on in our church is Emerging Spirit's call to build new relationships with those we (our church) have lost touch with...young adults, new Canadians, students. We have used the ads, training workshops, etc. to get tools to do this better, plus added our own stuff. But it's not about getting 'bums in pews' as much as getting oOUR bums OUT of the pews and into our neighbourhood to connect with others and what is happening in our community. For us it's as much about the change it brings our church - not about how we can change 20-35 year oolds or get them to come to church (well, we hope they might consider becoming involved, but this doesn't necessarily mean in Sunday morning. There are other ways to become involved in our church.) It's challenging and there is all the ususal opposition (God bless 'em), but personally I don't see any other way for us to grow as a church -- and I mean grow in QUALITY, not just quantity.
love your neighbour as yourself
yes Lupe I am commanded by Jesus Christ ,to focus on Him
as Lord and Master,to be His servant in the world and to be
guided by the Spirit in a personal transformation of faith.
My dreams and goals are either mine or Jesus has others plans
for me.Selfish ego chooses the former but selfless obediance
would require selling all and replying to the call"Come follow
Me" So I and many others are caught in a materialistic daily
struggle working to keep a roof over our personal heads and
the places where we worship.
In this world it is always raining on some neighbours but
hopefully not the same neighbour for a lifetime.The UCC
congregations that embrace the subject have opened the pews
as overnight hostels and others operate meal programs and
food banks or whatever needs are to be met.One of the primary
reasons why the early Christian church grew was that 50% of the
harvest went back out into the neighbourhood.Love in action.
The Bible talks about 7 years of harvest and 7 years of
famine but the courts of the UCC worry so much about the morrow
that the harvest built up over many years could last 30- 40
years and then only for specific purposes. Sounds like
Empire building the very thing that we condemn about our
economic participants.Take a leap of faith spend it all over
the next 7 years and pray that the Spirit working thorough
the Body of Christ will replenish it on an annual basis.
Our Presbytery Council formed in 1960 has 600k semi frozen
by its original purpose.Change the purpose and make the loving
decisions.What is the grand total for all the various courts
of the UCC?
What if the only mission of all the courts of the UCC was
"Love your neighbour,as yourself" and it appeared on signage,
letterhead ,bulletins ,websites etc.I am commanded to love
everyone however I do not have to like them.Abraham Lincoln
used to say to himself " I don't like that man,I think I will
have to get to know him."
Let us all pray to our Lord and Leader Jesus Christ that
the ES continues .He has His plans for me and you and our
neighbours.